Preaching to the Great Diversity of Us
I was a little disappointed in So That All Might Know:
Preaching that Engages the Whole Congregation by Thomas Troeger and
Edward Everding Jr. I heard Tom Troeger
preach wonderfully at The Montreat Music and Worship Conference last
summer. I hoped this new book might help
me gain insight into how Troeger approaches sermon preparation. It did.
Although he doesn’t go as far into the new territory into which I hoped
he might venture.
Tom Troeger nicely describes the enigma of preaching to a
congregation that seems to hear very different sermons than the one
preached. Indeed, listeners of the same
sermon often describe hearing very different messages. Troeger believes this is because people have
different learning styles and so assimilate the sermon differently. The theory of Eight Intelligences, outlined
by Howard Garner, has been utilized by educators in the classroom for some time. Troeger uses this theory to describe how the
sermon might be created so all listener/learners can hear and respond to the
gospel. It is Troeger’s implementation
of the eight intelligences theory for preaching that I found disappointing.
Writing for people with Linguistic intelligence is
relatively easy Troeger points out.
Most preachers have been writing for the “Word smart” among us
forever. Troeger suggests using
numerical calculations or scientific reasoning to capture the attention of the
Logical-mathematically intelligent. The
musically intelligent appreciate refrains and sound pictures with words. Troeger suggests the preacher needs to embody
the sermon so gestures flow freely for the bodily-kinesthetic learner. Those with spatial intelligence appreciate
having pictures and spaces drawn with words.
Those with Interpersonal intelligence and intrapersonal intelligence are
drawn to preaching that shows an understanding of people and self
awareness. Finally the naturalistically
intelligent listen well to preaching that is attune to the natural world.
While Troeger’s description of the various intelligences was
useful I was dissatisfied with how tied to the linguistic intelligence the
preaching connections were. In the end,
everything came back to words. One would
think the interest in multiple intelligence theory would give rise to preaching
that might make use of images, art or music or physical activity during the
message to engage the spatial, musical and kinesthetic learners. Perhaps elements from nature, plants,
flowers, rocks or water could be included in the preaching moment for the
naturalist. The Logical-mathematical
learners might appreciate a good puzzle to ponder. Those with interpersonal or intrapersonal
intelligence might find conversations in the pew intriguing. In short, there are surely ways to engage the
multiple intelligences other than simply using our words.
The second half of So
That All Might Know is devoted to preaching in child ways of knowing and
adult ways of knowing. While the first
section of the book, dealing with multiple intelligence theory seems to be
primarily authored by Tom Troeger; the child ways and adult ways of knowing
seems to come from Edward Everding.
Everding seems to loosely follow Fowler’s Stages of Faith as
he describes two kinds of childhood learning which he names Magical Maggie and
Literal Larry. Although somewhat simpler
than Fowler, these two typologies draw the preacher’s attention to a couple of
important childhood ways of knowing the world and remind us of the usefulness
of a child’s perspective. Not only do
children draw our attention to the mystical and simple realities of God,
children inhabit our pews with great regularity and deserve our consideration
as we preach.
I was not impressed with the four ways of adult
knowing. Everding again describes his
four ways of adult knowing using typologies.
However, whereas the child typologies seem to be based on stages of
faith tied to child development, the adult typologies do not seem to be tied to
anything. Rather they seem to be stereotypes
of personalities sometimes found in congregations. It is an intriguing idea, however, to consider
how different personality types might respond to sermons. Everding’s theories started me thinking about
the Myer’s Briggs personality preferences.
I began to wonder how a thinker or a feeler might respond to my work or
how a senser or intuitor might hear what I was saying.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home